Skip to Content

The Crying of Lot 49 (Allegory Explained)

The Crying of Lot 49 (Allegory Explained)

“The Crying of Lot 49” is a novel written by Thomas Pynchon that has been the subject of literary analysis for decades. The book is considered a postmodern masterpiece and is known for its complex plot, unique writing style, and use of allegory. The allegory in “The Crying of Lot 49” is a major theme in the book and is a source of interpretation and debate among literary scholars.

A mail carrier delivers a letter to a suburban home, while a mysterious symbol hovers in the sky above, casting a shadow over the neighborhood

The novel follows the story of Oedipa Maas, a woman who is named the executor of her ex-boyfriend’s estate. As she begins to unravel the conspiracy surrounding her ex-boyfriend’s life and death, she discovers a secret organization known as Tristero. The allegory in “The Crying of Lot 49” is centered around Tristero and its role in the novel’s plot. The organization is believed to represent a larger societal issue, and its existence is used to comment on the state of society at the time the book was written.

Historical Context of ‘The Crying of Lot 49’

A vintage postal office with a maze of letters and packages, a mysterious figure in the background, and a sense of confusion and intrigue

The Crying of Lot 49 was first published in 1966, during a time of great social and political upheaval in the United States. The Vietnam War was raging, the Civil Rights Movement was in full swing, and the counterculture was challenging traditional values and norms. Against this backdrop, Thomas Pynchon’s novel can be seen as a reflection of the anxieties and uncertainties of the era.

The novel is set in California in the mid-1960s, a time when the state was experiencing rapid growth and change. The post-war economic boom had led to a population explosion, and the rise of the aerospace and electronics industries had transformed the state’s economy. At the same time, the counterculture was flourishing in San Francisco and other cities, and the state was becoming a center of political and cultural experimentation.

The novel’s protagonist, Oedipa Maas, is a wealthy housewife who becomes embroiled in a complex conspiracy involving the postal system, a secret society, and a centuries-old feud between two mail distribution companies. Through her quest to unravel the mystery, she encounters a cast of eccentric characters and experiences a series of surreal and often disturbing events.

Pynchon’s novel can be seen as a commentary on the fragmented and paranoid nature of American society in the 1960s. The novel’s intricate plot and dense symbolism reflect the confusion and uncertainty of the era, while its themes of communication, control, and conspiracy speak to the anxieties of a society grappling with the challenges of the Cold War and the rise of mass media.

Overview of Allegory in Literature

A woman stands in a desolate landscape, surrounded by symbols of communication and conspiracy. A labyrinth of interconnected lines and arrows weaves through the scene, representing the complex web of allegory in literature

Definition of Allegory

Allegory is a literary device that uses symbolic figures, actions, or settings to convey a message or moral lesson. It is a form of extended metaphor where characters, objects, or events represent abstract ideas or concepts. Allegory is often used in literature to explore complex themes and ideas that may be difficult to convey through direct language.

Allegory vs. Symbolism

While allegory and symbolism are similar literary devices, they are not interchangeable. Symbolism uses one object or image to represent a larger idea or concept, while allegory uses a series of interconnected symbols to convey a more complex message. Allegory often involves a narrative structure where characters and events are used to represent abstract ideas or concepts.

Importance of Allegory in Storytelling

Allegory is an important tool in storytelling because it allows authors to explore complex themes and ideas in a way that is accessible to readers. By using symbolic language and characters, authors can create a deeper, more meaningful reading experience that encourages readers to think critically about the world around them. Allegory also allows authors to explore controversial or difficult topics in a way that is less confrontational or direct, making it a powerful tool for social commentary and political critique.

Main Allegories in ‘The Crying of Lot 49’

A labyrinthine postal system engulfs a woman in a web of mysterious symbols and cryptic messages, leading her on a surreal journey through a world of hidden meanings and conspiracies

The Tristero System

The Tristero system is the most prominent allegory in ‘The Crying of Lot 49.’ It is a secret underground postal system that is believed to have existed for centuries and is hidden from the public. The Tristero system represents the idea of an alternative system that exists parallel to the official system. It is a symbol of resistance against the establishment and the conventional way of doing things. The Tristero system is also a metaphor for the human desire for freedom and the need to break free from the constraints of society.

W.A.S.T.E. and the Mail System

W.A.S.T.E. is a mysterious acronym that appears throughout the novel. It is a secret code used by the Tristero system to communicate with each other. W.A.S.T.E. represents the idea of communication and the need for people to connect with each other. The mail system is also an allegory for communication and how it can be used to connect people. In the novel, the mail system is used to convey secret messages between the characters.

Entropy and Communication

Entropy is a concept that is central to the novel. It is the idea that everything in the universe is gradually moving towards a state of disorder and chaos. In the novel, entropy is used as an allegory for the breakdown of communication. The characters in the novel struggle to communicate with each other, and as a result, they become isolated and disconnected from each other. Entropy represents the chaos that arises when communication breaks down.

Yoyodyne and the Industrial Complex

Yoyodyne is a fictional company that appears in the novel. It is a symbol of the industrial complex and the negative effects it has on society. Yoyodyne represents the idea of progress at any cost, even if it means sacrificing the environment and the well-being of people. The company is a metaphor for the negative effects of industrialization and the need for society to find a balance between progress and sustainability.

Characters as Allegorical Figures

A woman with a puzzled expression holds a sealed envelope while surrounded by a chaotic jumble of symbols and signs, representing the confusion and disarray of modern life

Oedipa Maas

Oedipa Maas, the protagonist of The Crying of Lot 49, can be seen as an allegorical figure for the individual’s search for meaning and truth in a chaotic world. Her journey to uncover the mystery of the Trystero, a secret underground postal system, parallels the human quest for understanding the hidden meanings in life. Oedipa’s confusion and sense of isolation in the face of a vast, incomprehensible conspiracy reflects the existential angst that many individuals experience in modern society.

Pierce Inverarity

Pierce Inverarity, Oedipa’s millionaire ex-boyfriend, can be interpreted as an allegorical figure for the corrupting influence of wealth and power. Inverarity’s vast estate, which Oedipa is tasked with managing after his death, is revealed to be a labyrinthine network of companies and organizations that are involved in shady dealings and conspiracies. Inverarity’s death and the subsequent unraveling of his estate symbolize the moral decay and corruption that can result from unchecked greed and ambition.

Mucho Maas

Mucho Maas, Oedipa’s estranged husband, can be seen as an allegorical figure for the average person’s struggle to find meaning and purpose in a mundane existence. Mucho’s job as a radio DJ represents the superficiality and emptiness of modern media and entertainment. His eventual breakdown and descent into madness reflect the psychological toll of a life devoid of genuine human connection and purpose.

Themes and Motifs

Paranoia and Perception

The theme of paranoia and perception is central to The Crying of Lot 49. The protagonist, Oedipa Maas, is a conservative housewife who becomes obsessed with a conspiracy theory involving an underground group of mail carriers called Tristero. As she delves deeper into the mystery, she becomes increasingly paranoid and begins to question her own perceptions of reality. This theme highlights the idea that reality is subjective and can be influenced by one’s perception of it.

Chaos and Order

Another important theme in The Crying of Lot 49 is the struggle between chaos and order. The novel explores the tension between the two and suggests that chaos is an inherent part of the human experience. The Tristero conspiracy represents this chaos, as it is a mysterious and elusive force that disrupts the order of society. Oedipa’s search for meaning in the chaos of the conspiracy highlights the human desire for order and control.

The Search for Meaning

The search for meaning is a recurring motif in The Crying of Lot 49. Oedipa’s quest to uncover the truth behind the Tristero conspiracy represents the human desire to find meaning in a world that can often seem chaotic and meaningless. The novel suggests that this search for meaning is ultimately futile, as reality is subjective and can be influenced by perception. This motif highlights the existential themes present throughout the novel.

Analysis of Key Passages

Opening Scene

The opening scene of “The Crying of Lot 49” sets the tone for the rest of the novel. Oedipa Maas, the protagonist, is introduced as a wealthy housewife who is experiencing a sense of ennui. She receives a letter informing her that she has been named the executor of the estate of her ex-boyfriend, Pierce Inverarity. This event sets off a chain of events that lead Oedipa down a rabbit hole of conspiracy theories and paranoia. The scene is significant because it establishes the theme of the novel, which is the search for meaning in a chaotic world.

The Will Reading

The will reading scene is a pivotal moment in the novel. Oedipa attends the reading of Pierce Inverarity’s will and learns that he has left her a large inheritance. She is also introduced to a group of people who are involved in a secret organization called the Tristero. This scene is significant because it marks the beginning of Oedipa’s journey into the world of the Tristero. It also highlights the theme of the novel, which is the search for meaning in a world that is full of secrets and hidden agendas.

The Auction

The auction scene is the climax of the novel. Oedipa attends an auction where she hopes to find evidence of the Tristero’s existence. She becomes increasingly paranoid as she realizes that everyone around her may be part of the organization. The scene is significant because it represents the culmination of Oedipa’s journey. She is forced to confront the fact that the world is full of mysteries that may never be solved. The scene also highlights the theme of the novel, which is the search for truth in a world that is full of lies and deception.

Influence on Postmodern Literature

Thomas Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49 is considered a seminal work in postmodern literature. The novel’s unique style and tone, which play crucial roles in conveying the novel’s themes and enhancing its mysterious atmosphere, have influenced many postmodern writers.

Pynchon’s use of fragmentation, intertextuality, and metafiction, which are all common characteristics of postmodern literature, have been highly influential. The novel’s fragmented structure, in which the narrative is broken up into short sections, reflects the fragmented nature of modern life and the difficulty of finding meaning in a chaotic world.

Furthermore, Pynchon’s use of intertextuality, in which he references other literary works, historical events, and cultural phenomena, has inspired many postmodern writers to incorporate similar elements into their own works. The novel’s metafictional elements, in which the author acknowledges the artificiality of the narrative and the act of storytelling, have also been highly influential.

Interpreting the Ending

The ending of “The Crying of Lot 49” has been a topic of debate and discussion among readers for decades. The book ends with the auction of Pierce Inverarity’s stamp collection, with lot 49 being the last item to be sold. Some readers interpret the ending as a metaphor for the futility of Oedipa’s search for meaning and truth. The fact that lot 49 turns out to be a forgery suggests that even the most valuable things in life may be meaningless.

Others see the ending as a commentary on the nature of truth and knowledge. The fact that there is no clear resolution to the mystery of the Tristero suggests that the truth may be impossible to uncover. The auction itself may be seen as a metaphor for the commodification of knowledge and truth, with even the most valuable ideas being reduced to mere objects to be bought and sold.

Legacy and Critical Reception

The Crying of Lot 49 is a novel that has received mixed reviews from critics. While some have praised its unique style and tone, others have criticized it for being too convoluted and difficult to follow. Despite this, the book has had a lasting impact on the literary world and is considered a classic of postmodern literature.

One of the most notable aspects of The Crying of Lot 49 is its use of allegory. Many critics have praised the novel for its intricate use of symbols and themes, which are used to comment on a variety of social and political issues. The book has been interpreted in many different ways, with some readers seeing it as a commentary on the Cold War, while others view it as a critique of capitalism.

Despite its mixed critical reception, The Crying of Lot 49 has had a lasting impact on the literary world. It has been studied extensively in universities and is often cited as an important work of postmodern literature. The book has also been adapted into other forms of media, including a play and an opera.